Family of Wetherell, John and Graham, Annabell
Families
| Married | Husband | Wetherell, John ( * about Apr 1839 + about Jan 1913 ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Married | Wife | Graham, Annabell ( * about Oct 1846 + about Oct 1920 ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Children | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Birth Date | Death Date |
|---|---|---|
| Wetherell, John W. | Jan 1866 | |
| Wetherell, Alfred Simpson | 7 Dec 1868 | 1 Jan 1871 |
| Wetherell, Elizabeth | about Oct 1869 | |
| Wetherell, Jane | Jul 1873 | |
| Wetherell, Robert Graham | about Jan 1879 | 20 Jun 1917 |
| Wetherell, Alice Isabel | about Oct 1883 | |
| Wetherell, Annie | about Jan 1886 | |
| Wetherell, Ethel Mary | about Jul 1888 |
Notes
Note
John Wetherell children:
Based on a careful cross-examination of all three previous census sheets (1871, 1881, and 1891) alongside the newly provided 1901 household sheet, the family’s structural chronology reveals exactly nine distinct children born to John and Anabell.
The confusion almost always stems from the twins, overlapping initials, variations in first names recorded by different enumerators, or adult children moving out before a specific census night.
## Complete Chronological List of the 9 Children
Here is the master reconstruction of the siblings in birth order:
1. John William (J.W.) Wetherell (Born c. 1864–1865)
* Census appearances: 1871 (age 6), 1881 (age 16, working as a butcher's assistant).
* Status by 1891: Moved out to establish his own independent household.
2. Mary Wetherell (Born c. 1870)
* Census appearances: 1871 (age 11 months), 1881 (age 11). She is a twin to Elizabeth/Thomasine.
* The 1901 Clue: She is almost certainly the "Jeannie T." (age 27) who reappeared in the 1901 household context.
3. Elizabeth Wetherell (Born c. 1870)
* Census appearances: 1871 (listed as T. E., age 1), 1881 (listed as T. E., age 11), 1891 (as [Elizabeth](https://www.google.com/search?q=elizabeth&kgmid=/g/11q1hbcvv9), age 23), 1901 (as Elizabeth Ridley, age 31, married to the piano tuner John). She is Mary's twin.
4. Alfred Wetherell (Born c. 1876)
* Census appearances: 1901 (age 25, working as an insurance clerk).
* Why he was missed: He was absent from the 1881 child index list as a toddler and was away from home during the 1891 census night. His presence in the 1901 family home locks him in as a definitive son.
5. Robert Graham Wetherell (Born c. 1879)
* Census appearances: 1881 (listed as R., age 2), 1891 (listed as Robert Graham, age 12), 1901 (listed as Robert G., age 22, working as a plumber).
6. Alice Graham Wetherell (Born c. 1882)
* Census appearances: 1891 (age 8), 1901 (age 18).
7. Annie Wetherell (Born c. 1885)
* Census appearances: 1891 (age 5), 1901 (age 15).
8. John Wetherell Jr. (Born c. 1887)
* Census appearances: 1891 (age 4).
* Status by 1901: He is not found in the 1901 household sheet, meaning he either passed away in childhood or was living elsewhere as an early teen apprentice.
9. Ethel Mary Wetherell (Born c. 1889)
* Census appearances: 1891 (age 2), 1901 (age 12, working as a dress milliner).
## Why Your List Was Short
Your count likely missed Alfred (who skipped census years at home) or treated the twins (Mary and Elizabeth/T.E.) as a single child due to the messy initials written on the high-density 1871 and 1881 sheets. Collating them together tracks beautifully to the 9 total children officially claimed by the parents in 1911.
If you are missing details on any specific sibling, would you like to verify the exact civil birth registration index entries for the twins or young [John Jr.](https://www.google.com/search?q=john+jr.&kgmid=/m/0gym84r) to trace his fate?
By cross-referencing our master list of 9 children across the 1871, 1881, 1891, and 1901 census sheets, we can clearly isolate who was still alive and accounted for at the turn of the century.
Out of the 9 children, six are entirely accounted for and alive in the 1901 census (Elizabeth, Robert Graham, Alice, Annie, Ethel, and Alfred). This leaves exactly three highly likely candidates who account for the deaths mentioned in the 1911 census records: [1]
## 1. John Wetherell Jr. (The Strongest Candidate)
*
* The Evidence: He appears as a 4-year-old child in the 1891 census household on Smithy Street. However, ten years later in the 1901 census at Wharton Street, he is completely missing. While a 14-year-old boy could occasionally be away working as an apprentice, the fact that he vanishes completely from subsequent family records makes him the primary candidate for one of the childhood deaths.
*
## 2. John William (J.W.) Wetherell (The Independent/Adulthood Candidate)
*
* The Evidence: As the oldest son, he was alive and well at age 16 working as a butcher's assistant in 1881. He moved out before the 1891 census to establish his own adult life. If he is one of the three deceased children by 1911, it means he passed away as a young adult in his late 20s or 30s during the 1890s or 1900s.
*
## 3. Mary Wetherell (The Mystery Sibling Candidate)
*
* The Evidence: Mary appears as an 11-month-old baby in 1871 and an 11-year-old twin in 1881. In the 1901 census, a 27-year-old daughter named "Jeannie T." suddenly appears in the household.
* The Twisting Paths:
* If "Jeannie T." is actually Mary listed under a nickname/middle name, then Mary is alive in 1901. This would mean John William (J.W.) must have died to make up the count of three.
* If "Jeannie T." is a completely different child (or relative) and the real Mary never returned after 1881, then Mary likely passed away as a teenager or young adult between 1881 and 1891.
*
## Summary Verdict
The mathematical timeline of the census forms implies that John Wetherell Jr. is almost certainly one of the three deceased. The remaining two deaths belong to a combination of the older children (John William or Mary) passing away in early adulthood, or a brief infant birth and death that occurred entirely between census years (e.g., a baby born and deceased between 1871–1881 or 1881–1891) that never got recorded on a census night. [2]
Would you like to verify the exact fates of John William (J.W.) or Mary by checking the local South Shields civil death indexes for their names between 1881 and 1911?
[1] [https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk](https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/census-records/)
[2] [https://forums.lc](https://forums.lc/genealogy/index.php?threads/errors-in-1911-census-of-england.1584/)